Packet Requirements for Mid 10-Year Review

UNCSA uses Interfolio Review, Promotion & Tenure (RPT), a faculty-oriented online secure platform, for submission and evaluation of materials provided by faculty members undergoing Mid 10-Year Review. Faculty Affairs will send Candidates an email via the Interfolio platform with a link to “View Case” along with links to User Guides in Interfolio RPT

Questions regarding these guidelines should be addressed to Kim Pauley in the Office of Faculty Affairs at 336-770-3261 or pauleyk@uncsa.edu.

Candidate Materials

Due September 1 Unless Otherwise Noted

1. Self-Evaluation
Self-Evaluation Template for Mid 10-Year Review

The self-evaluation serves as the foundation of the Candidate’s packet materials and Mid 10-Year Review.  Using the Self-Evaluation Template for Mid 10-Year Review, the Candidate will first provide his/her Philosophy of Teaching Statement.  He/she will next provide a self-assessment of his/her activities and performance for the contract period under review.  This self-assessment should include an overview of teaching, creative activity/research, and service.     

2. Curriculum Vitae (CV)
The most recent version of the Candidate's CV.  It should be dated and paginated.  It should include a list of courses taught, a list of administrative assignments and professional creative activity/research.

3. Student Course Evaluations
These are the Candidate’s Student Course Evaluations for the period under review.  Candidates should organize the student course evaluations in chronological order.   As you are naming and organizing your materials, keep in mind reviewers are not necessarily familiar with them.

The Candidate should check with the Dean’s Office if he/she does not have copies of his/her student course evaluations for the period under review.

4. Syllabi
These are the Candidate’s syllabi for courses taught during the period under review. Candidates should organize syllabi in chronological order.   As you are naming and organizing your materials, keep in mind reviewers are not necessarily familiar with them.

5. Annual Evaluations
The Candidate’s Annual Evaluation/Update of Professional Activities Form, Parts I & II for each year of the period under review.  As you are naming and organizing your materials, keep in mind reviewers are not necessarily familiar with them.

The faculty member should check with the Dean’s Office if he/she is missing either Part I or Part II of the Annual Evaluation.    

6. Optional Supplemental Support
The Candidate may include any additional information in support of the review; however, supplemental support is not required.

7. Optional Candidate Response to the Dean Regarding the Peer Review Committee Evaluation
Due March 1

The Candidate may elect to submit an optional response to the Dean, including additional supplemental materials, regarding the Peer Review Committee Evaluation. 

8. Optional Candidate Response to the Provost Regarding the Peer Review Committee Evaluation
Due April 8

The Candidate may elect to submit an optional response to the Provost, including additional supplemental materials, regarding the Dean’s Evaluation.